Hi there! You are currently browsing as a guest. Why not create an account? Then you get less ads, can thank creators, post feedback, keep a list of your favourites, and more!
Replies: 3 (Who?), Viewed: 999 times.
CameraLover
Test Subject
Original Poster
#1 Old 6th Apr 2015 at 1:39 PM Last edited by CameraLover : 6th Apr 2015 at 1:51 PM.
Default Can this DETICATED graphics card run TS2 on maximum settings?
Hello! I was just wondering if a AMD A6-6310 Quad-core 1.80 GHz processer and a AMD Radeon R5 M240 with 1 GB Dedicated Memory would run TS2 on maximum settings, Shiny neighborhood water and all!
Advertisement
ajaxsirius
Scholar
#2 Old 6th Apr 2015 at 5:36 PM
I'm pretty sure that's not a dedicated graphics card. It's just the GPU portion of an APU.

In any case it's one of the weaker graphic solutions you could get. According to this: http://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-Ra...0.126735.0.html it performs very weakly at 1366x768. TS2 is an old game though, so I think you could get away with medium ish settings. I can't really say if you'll get good framerates at maximum settings. Sorry.
CameraLover
Test Subject
Original Poster
#3 Old 6th Apr 2015 at 11:50 PM
Quote: Originally posted by ajaxsirius
I'm pretty sure that's not a dedicated graphics card. It's just the GPU portion of an APU.

In any case it's one of the weaker graphic solutions you could get. According to this: http://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-Ra...0.126735.0.html it performs very weakly at 1366x768. TS2 is an old game though, so I think you could get away with medium ish settings. I can't really say if you'll get good framerates at maximum settings. Sorry.


Well on the laptop specs, it says it has deticated memory... http://us.acer.com/ac/en/US/content/model/NX.MLGAA.001
ajaxsirius
Scholar
#4 Old 7th Apr 2015 at 4:13 AM
Quote: Originally posted by CameraLover
Well on the laptop specs, it says it has deticated memory... http://us.acer.com/ac/en/US/content/model/NX.MLGAA.001


D'oh I think you're right. I found it on the AMD website. In any case the review for it (see above) isn't stellar.
 
Back to top